Sony charging devs for user downloads

Discussion in 'Console Talk (Public)' started by GiantDave7, Apr 20, 2009.

  1. GiantDave7

    GiantDave7 Getting Started

    Dec 29, 2007
    Likes Received:
    Brisbane, Queensland
    Looks like Sony has started to charge publishers/developers for the hosting of content on the order of US16c per GB of file transfers (thats user transfered ie: if you put a 1GB demo on the PSN, Sony would charge you US16c for every person who downloads your demo).
    Could this be the reason why cross platform demos/content have been delayed or not released on PSN lately compared with Live?

    Someone pays: Sony charges publishers for PS3 bandwidth - Ars Technica

    Your thoughts....
  2. George

    George Retired Captain

    Jul 16, 2006
    Likes Received:
    Abu Dhabi, UAE
    It looks like we won't be getting that many demos on the PS3. But i think it's a small price to keep the PSN free.
  3. Drac

    Drac Squad Officer

    Oct 30, 2006
    Likes Received:
    Brisbane, Australia
    That's fairly cheap all things considered. I doubt you'd find too many publishers that would even blink at something like that. The main reason publishers don't put out demos is because the're concerned that they won't show the full potential of the game. A lot of rather complex games don't have demos. A lot of crap games don't have demos either, not at launch anyway.
  4. Pure Mongrel

    Pure Mongrel Retired Captain

    Aug 9, 2006
    Likes Received:
    Geelong way from Brisbane
    Is $70Aus that big a price to pay per year for a faster more stable online experience?

    With SONY losing a billion dollars last year, I can't see them continuing the free service for ever.

    As to charging publishers, this seems a little one sided to me. I bet you dollars to doughnuts that SONY won't charge big publishing houses the fee for fear of losing premium titles for the console. (Imagine if EA said they would no longer develop games for the PS3 due to the cost of demos and online services, SONY would back flip so fast ... any console manufacturer would). This means that the smaller developers will still pay and have another obstacle in their way and titles that are not quite as formulaic as the games that get regurgitated every year may be lost. (Only a theory of course but an educated one.)

    Maybe they should bite the bullet (deal with the backlash) now and at the very least discuss the pro's and con's of a free vs paid service with their users.

    I may be in the minority, but I would happily pay a subscription fee just to get the updates faster, or access to demos from smaller publishers, let alone better online play.
    Last edited: May 26, 2009

Share This Page